The battle of Shiloh, like other battles and campaigns in the Western theater of the Civil War, has been overshadowed by their counterparts in the East. There are only a dozen or so accounts of this battle. Historians James Lee McDonough, Larry Daniel, and Tim Smith have written some of the more scholarly accounts of the battle while Jeff Shaara and Winston Groom have written narratives geared toward the general public. So, how does Wiley Sword’s Shiloh: Bloody April, originally published in 1983, stack up with the other accounts?
Sword provides perhaps the most detailed account of the battle. After numerous reverses in the West, Confederate leadership gathered forces from throughout the South to launch a surprise attack on an unsuspecting Union army encamped along the Tennessee River twenty miles north of the critical rail junction at Corinth, Mississippi. From beginning to end, Sword’s meticulous narrative is the most complete, providing an abundance of information about all things related to the campaign and battle. Although this version is great for those looking for specific facts, it does make reading the book somewhat of a chore. Most works concerning battles tend to be page turners as the reader tracks the ebb and flow of the battle to its climatic conclusion. To this reader’s dismay, Sword’s narrative is so slow moving and methodical that closing the book and stopping is easy to do. No doubt that Sword conducted a tremendous amount of research, but information provided about Confederate and Union troops are described in a detail that is almost too hard to follow as the reader’s eyes gloss over so many names and facts. The book does contain plenty of maps, but at times, there are not enough.
Sword’s story does relate all the necessary information about the conflict. Sword discusses the background leading up to the clash on April 6 and 7, the various commanders and their decisions, the battle itself, and finally its aftermath. Sword does emphasize the struggle for the “Hornet’s Nest.” Sword’s point of Confederates being given directives about “marching towards the heaviest fighting” caused this tactical error. Confederates launched several uncoordinated assaults at this Union position which took too much time, thereby allowing the Union command the opportunity to establish a final position which was never assaulted with a full force due to darkness which ended the battle’s first day. Recent historians such as Tim Smith, however, have questioned the importance of the “Hornet’s Nest.”
Sword’s research did unearth plenty of quotes from the battle’s participants that enrich the story. Sword scatters these throughout the narrative, providing a personal touch of the horrific nature of the battle and its aftermath. For example, a Confederate soldier recounted how after the battle’s first day, he crawled into a tent to avoid the rainstorm and awoke the next morning to learn “he had slept with a dead Yankee.” To be honest, these personal reminiscences helped me survive the tedious narrative.
What I hoped would be the best part of the book was the last chapter exploring Shiloh’s enduring controversies. Unlike the rest of the book, Sword quickly discusses issues such as did the Confederate battle plan and troop formation prevent victory and could the Confederates have broken Grant’s last line? Unfortunately, the author does not seem to emphatically state an opinion one way or the other. It appears his purpose was simply to say these controversies continue whereas I want to know exactly what his research has led him to believe.
The book I reviewed was a 2001 revision, which Sword states allowed him to utilized material not available when he first wrote the book. The biggest inclusion of material relates to being able to determine the actual death site of A.S. Johnston. And in a microcosm of the entire book, Sword recounts his journey, step by step, to find the location of Johnston’s wounding and death site based upon maps that were recently uncovered. Reading that appendix was exhausting and I must admit that I did not read it word for word. Unfortunately, most of the book felt like that.
I am never comfortable writing what I feel is a bad review of a book. Sword should be complimented on his exhaustive research and detailed narrative. Information he uncovered is no doubt very useful for scholars trying to better understand the story. As for this reviewer, whose favorite Civil War battle is Shiloh, I simply cannot recommend this book to anyone looking for a great read on this monumental moment during the Civil War.
CPW