Thankfully, the bicentennial of the War of 1812 and the first Creek War has spurred the publication of several works detailing the actions of these important, though lesser known conflicts. This scholarship as a whole has not necessarily furthered our understanding of the period to a significant degree, however. Nevertheless, we were both excited to hear that long-time Tennessee archivist and historian Tom Kanon was going to add to this list of new scholarship with a book chronicling the activities of Volunteer State soldiers during these years. As an employee of the Tennessee State Archives, Kanon has been researching this topic for years and had already produced many solid articles on the subject and we anxiously awaited his book with hopes of gaining new insight. Kanon does provide a solid and comprehensive overview of these years in Tennesseans at War. But, like so much that has appeared recently, we are not sure that those with a basic understanding of the War of 1812 will really learn very much that is new or gain any new perspectives from the publication.

Kanon starts by setting the scene in Tennessee and the surrounding area prior to the war and providing background information of the conflicts to come. He does a thorough job at this; in fact, perhaps too good. It seems to take while for the reader to get to the conflicts themselves in a relatively small book. (For instance, Tennessee troops are not issued orders to rendezvous after the war-opening assault on Fort Mims until page 71 of a 200 page book.) We do want to complement him on the excellent job he does providing an overview of the complexities of the situation within the Creek nation at the onset of war; a confusing subject to many readers (us included) and he handles it with ease. He also delineates who, why, and under what conditions the Tennessee troops who played such a pivotal role in the war fought better than most other Creek War studies.
Kanon then proceeds to outline the campaigns, battles, and difficulties of the Tennessee troops encountered as they attempted to crush the Red Stick rebellion. The narrative moves quickly, as each battle (with the exception of Horseshoe Bend) is discussed in overview, even cursory, fashion. Those familiar with the topic will note that although Kanon may be the single person most familiar with the surviving documentary sources from the campaigns of Tennessee soldiers during the Creek War, there is really nothing new in his account. Perhaps that is not a failing as much as a commentary on the state of scholarship about the war. Generations of scholars have evaluated its relatively sparse documentary trail and developed a generally accepted narrative for most of the major events that occurred during the conflict. We certainly don’t know everything, but we may have found as much as we are likely to know about many aspects of the Creek War. About all we probably can expect most scholars to do is produce a well-written narrative arranging a series of established facts. With all that said, it is curious that one of the most interesting stories associated with Jackson and the war—his supposed adoption of a Creek child named Lyncoya—goes unmentioned.
Upon reflection it may come as no surprise that the participation of Tennessee soldiers in the campaign for New Orleans in late 1814 and early 1815 receives so much of Kanon’s attention. There seems to simply be more material from which to draw. Indeed, his discussion of this action begins just past the midway point of the book. He analyzes every detail of the several fights which culminated in Jackson’s triumphant victory on January 8, 1815, at times making the second half of the book stand in remarkable contrast to the first. The result is one of the better accounts of the Battle for New Orleans, but one understandably focused on its Tennessee participants. Kanon concludes the book with an insightful analysis of what the Creek War and the War of 1812 ultimately meant for Tennessee and the nation, both in terms of individuals and regional destiny which probably speaks to his deep knowledge of the events and era as well or better than the great majority of the rest of the book.
In final analysis, Kanon’s book is a must-have for those few devoted afficiendos of the Creek War and the War of 1812 who, if they so choose, can realistically attempt to obtain every worthwhile volume written on this long-overlooked subject. It will certainly be of interest to those who study the history of Tennessee, and it does well in achieving its stated goal of discussing the wars “through the words and actions of those Tennesseans…who lived through that period” (7). It will not in any regard replace older, more comprehensive works on the subjects it features by authors such as Owsley and Remini.
CPW/JMB