Getting Out of the Mud, Dr. Martin T. Olliff’s latest book, reminds us that indeed literally everything has a history, even the process by which we as Americans have converted backwoods trails into a paved highway transportation system. Perhaps more importantly, however, he also reminds us that everything has a context, and to truly understand how milestone events link to gather one must grasp the circumstances of their occurrence. So part and parcel of the story of Alabama’s halting efforts to develop highway infrastructure is a broader tale about Alabama’s people and politics during an important era which “paved” the way for the development of the modern state.
I will admit the nuances of Progressive Era political dynamics are well outside my wheelhouse, and I cannot claim to be well versed enough in the literature on the subject to evaluate adequately for an academic audience the book’s true value to the study of the time period chronicled. But one need not be an expert in early twentieth century America to see that the book features some obvious and noteworthy analyses of an understudied epoch that anyone interested in Alabama’s past can certainly appreciate. While it may not cover a subject that lends itself easily to riveting historical narrative, the volume has been awarded the Anne B. and James B. McMillan Prize award in Southern History (awarded by the University of Alabama Press) for a reason; it tells an important story fundamental to our contemporary reality which few have attempted to explain and frames it in both its cultural and political contexts.
Those who might consider picking up the book should know that author Martin Olliff is a multi-talented and accomplished historian who is anything but the crusty academic. Professor of history and director of the Wiregrass Archives at Troy University, Dothan, he is a popular and engaging speaker on a variety of topics for groups across the state and beyond, editorial board member of both The Alabama Review and Provenance: The Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists, as well as actively involved in numerous organizations and worthwhile history-focused initiatives too numerous to mention. He has also become one of Alabama’s leading scholars on the WWI era, serving as editor of The Great War in the Heart of Dixie: Alabama in World War I. In other words, Olliff is a man who knows his subject and knows how to sift through mountains of information to communicate the essence of a story in intelligible fashion and does it with enthusiasm.
In Getting Out of the Mud, he communicates a story few know much about and one I would venture to guess many more have scarcely given serious thought. It describes one of the major projects of Progressive-era Alabama (those are not necessarily mutually-exclusive terms!), an eventful but all but forgotten time in the state’s history which did much to shape the trajectory of its modern development. Despite certain contemporary assumptions, Olliff demonstrates there indeed once was a time when sizable numbers of Alabama’s leaders and rank and file citizens actually championed more government involvement in far-reaching programs benefitting its populace. Plus, for the most part, they were willing to pay for it to boot. Inspired by a national movement urging the finding of solutions for a variety of societal ills ranging from worker compensation to corruption,—known as Progressivism—the grass-roots effort to establish a modern and efficient road system in the state featured a particularly effective coalition of average citizens, politicians, businessmen, farmers, and civic boosters. Their goal—good roads—was relatively simple, and to make a long story short they accomplished some specific objectives in remarkable fashion. The Good Roads Movement literally got Alabama “out of the mud” and onto the path of a modern highway infrastructure system within the span of a few critical decades, Olliff demonstrates.
But he also says far more worth pondering for historians and those interested in understanding the connection between modern and past realities. He shows the movement to better Alabama’s roads for the benefit of its citizens and economy to be part of a fascinating wider national effort which would later contribute substantially to the creation of today’s large, complex, bureaucratic government infrastructure. That infrastructure is to a degree both exactly what Alabamians clamored long and hard to create so that they could have a better and more prosperous place to live and precisely what so many in the state now rail against as part of an anachronistic doctrine that is at odds with our own history. In other words, the story of Alabama’s road development is a sort of microcosm for understanding how we moved from homespun proposals based in real needs to modern government responsibilities. We have come a long way from the days of staged-for-publicity “exploratory journeys” attempting to find suitable routes for paved roads connecting major cities to having the state’s Department of Transportation be one of its largest financial obligations. Getting Out of the Mud connects those two drastically different eras, and helps us understand just how far historical developments can reach.
JMB